EEA Regulated-Fintech Tracker
This edition covers July to early October 2026. The ESMA Interim MiCA Register listed 362 authorised CASPs on 30 September, against the roughly 210 cited in the July snapshot, and the mix is shifting: 144 of the 362 are traditional-finance firms and 218 are crypto-native. Register analysis reported in September put banks' MiCA-listed footprint at about 80 providers, roughly double its level in late June, and about 23% of the register. Germany leads with 96 authorisations, ahead of France (36) and the Netherlands (29). On stablecoins, 22 e-money token issuers were authorised as of 8 August and no asset-referenced token issuer had been authorised as of 1 September. Post-deadline supervision so far has been warnings rather than headline sanctions: the CSSF (2 July) and AMF (8 July) warned about unauthorised providers and misuse of the reverse-solicitation exemption, and BaFin published twelve unauthorised-business notices between 2 and 11 September, five of them naming crypto-asset services. On 1 October AMLA finalised its first three regulatory technical standards (customer due diligence, business relationships and linked transactions, and group-wide arrangements) and sent them to the European Commission; they apply six months after Official Journal publication. The EBA responded to the Commission's MiCA review consultation on 24 September. PSD3 and PSR remain pending formal adoption and publication in the sources we checked. EMI and PI counts and the banking-access panel are carried forward from the July review and were not refreshed for this edition.
Snapshot 2026-10 · published 2026-10-06 · methodology
Where's the door open this month?
Per-jurisdiction temperature read on banking-access reality for foreign-controlled regulated fintechs. Tier-archetype framing — finconduit does not name specific banks per its published constraint.
Tier 1 — EU clearing
Post-1-July, Tier-1 EU clearing serves authorised CASPs only. A granted CASP licence (or credit-institution / EMI authorisation for issuers) is the hard precondition — no authorisation, no Tier-1 account. Onboarding cycles 16–26 weeks once the licence is in hand.
Tier 2 — Specialist
Tier-2 specialist EEA banks and EMI-as-correspondent partners are the working layer for authorised CASPs, and for firms repositioning their EU structure post-deadline. Pricing has firmed. Onboarding 6–14 weeks; AML / TM programme depth is the binding constraint.
Tier 3 — Crypto-aware
Tier-3 crypto-aware correspondents continue to onboard at scale, including non-EEA-facing firms that exited the EU perimeter but still need rails elsewhere. Sanctions-screening and KYT depth remain the binding constraints. Onboarding 4–10 weeks.
Germany
StableTier-1 EU clearing serves authorised CASPs only: a granted licence is now the hard gate, not a nice-to-have. BaFin continues to publish consumer notices against unauthorised crypto providers.
Netherlands
StableAFM-authorised CASPs retain workable Tier-1 access. With the perimeter now clean, banking onboarding is a function of the authorisation itself; the transitional ambiguity is gone.
France
StableFrance remains the most workable Tier-1 banking corridor for authorised crypto activity. AMF paired an open authorisation pathway with a post-deadline enforcement sweep against the unauthorised.
Ireland
ImprovingEnglish-speaking corridor workable for authorised US-headquartered groups. Several large exchanges chose Ireland as their EU authorisation base, anchoring Tier-1 relationships there.
Lithuania
StableThe EEA's deepest EMI/PI hub (82 EMIs / 45 PIs) still has the banking layer as its binding constraint. Authorised CASPs route through Tier-2 specialist partners; Tier-1 correspondent reach has not recovered.
Estonia
StablePost-2022 cleansing residue persists; the deadline thinned the local VASP population further as unconverted firms ceased. FI authorisation still does not translate automatically into euro IBANs.
Luxembourg
StableStrong private + institutional banking; Tier-2 specialist partners onboard authorised firms with mature AML programmes. CSSF Circular 26/906 governance-alignment continues to raise the substance bar.
Malta
StableMalta now has 25 authorised CASPs. Post-Moneyval drag persists; Tier-2 specialist banking via EU correspondents typical, local Tier-1 access narrow.
Cyprus
StableCySEC has authorised 24 CASPs, one of the larger cohorts in the EEA. Banking remains the constraint: limited Cypriot correspondent reach, EMI-partner reliance the norm.
- No new material banking events logged this month. The posture above is carried forward from the previous review.
We see the operating reality these tracker entries reflect — every working day.
Authorisation in progress, banking-access pressure, an inspection finding to remediate, a regulatory deadline approaching — book a free assessment to map the right next move against your specific facts.
Book a regulatory assessment- Regulator-issued
ESMA Interim MiCA Register, CASP list. 362 authorised CASPs as of 30 September 2026 (144 traditional-finance, 218 crypto-native). Per-country counts are taken from a register-derived dashboard (see casp-dashboard); the EEA total was corroborated by a second tracker (361). Verify against ESMA's published register files.
https://www.esma.europa.eu/esmas-activities/digital-finance-and-innovation/markets-crypto-assets-regulation-micaVerified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
outrun.at MiCA CASP dashboard, derived from the ESMA register, snapshot 30 September 2026. Used for per-country CASP counts. A third-party aggregation, not a regulator publication.
https://www.outrun.at/micar-dashboardVerified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
E-money token issuers authorised under MiCA Title IV: 22 as of 8 August 2026, per third-party stablecoin trackers reading the ESMA register. Older than the CASP figure; EEA-wide only, no per-country split.
https://casptracker.eu/e-money-token-list-under-mica/Verified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
Asset-referenced token issuers authorised under MiCA Title III: 0 as of 1 September 2026, per third-party stablecoin trackers reading the ESMA register.
https://casptracker.eu/e-money-token-list-under-mica/Verified 2026-10-06 - Regulator-issued
AMLA press release, 1 October 2026: finalisation of three RTS (customer due diligence, business relationships and linked transactions, group-wide arrangements), submitted to the European Commission.
https://www.amla.europa.eu/press-release-amla-finalises-key-standards-private-sector_enVerified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
MiCA Crypto Alliance, 17 September 2026: summary of BaFin's unauthorised-business notices (2 to 11 September) and ESMA's second 2026 risk monitoring report (10 September). Relays the regulators' publications; primary notices are on BaFin's and ESMA's websites.
https://www.micacryptoalliance.com/news/esma-and-bafin-sharpen-scrutiny-of-crypto-markets-and-unlicensed-platformsVerified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
Law-firm commentary on PSD3 / PSR: final compromise texts published 23 April 2026, ECON approval 5 May 2026. Formal adoption and Official Journal publication not confirmed in the sources checked as of 6 October 2026; verify on EUR-Lex.
https://www.arthurcox.com/insights/psd3-and-psr-final-compromise-texts-published/Verified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
News report relaying Cointelegraph analysis of ESMA register data: banks' share of the MiCA provider list rose to 23% by 16 September 2026, with their footprint roughly doubling to about 80 providers between 26 June and 16 September. Context for the summary; not a regulator figure.
https://www.kucoin.com/news/flash/banks-surge-on-eu-mica-crypto-provider-list-shares-up-23Verified 2026-10-06 - Regulator-issued
EBA response to the European Commission's targeted consultation on the review of MiCA, 24 September 2026. The consultation opened on 20 May 2026.
https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2026-09/12cb4f01-0d51-46bf-a561-165ac486698f/EBA%20response%20to%20EC%20targeted%20consultation%20on%20MiCA%20review.pdfVerified 2026-10-06 - Practitioner-published
Compliance Corylated, 20 July 2026: CSSF warning of 2 July (reverse-solicitation exemption) and AMF warning of 8 July (38 names added to its unauthorised-sites list since January 2026). Referenced in the summary; outside the trailing-30-day enforcement feed.
https://www.compliancecorylated.com/news/european-regulators-warn-of-unauthorised-crypto-firms-after-mica-deadline/Verified 2026-10-06 - Regulator-issued
BaFin — Database of authorised institutions (EMIs, PIs, MiCA CASPs).
https://www.bafin.de/EN/PublikationenDaten/Datenbanken/datenbanken_node_en.htmlVerified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
DNB — Public registers of authorised institutions (EMI, PI, ART / EMT issuers).
https://www.dnb.nl/en/public-registers/Verified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
ACPR / Banque de France — REGAFI register of authorised financial institutions.
https://acpr.banque-france.fr/en/popular-services/regafiVerified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
Central Bank of Ireland — Registers of regulated entities.
https://registers.centralbank.ieVerified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
Bank of Lithuania — Public register of supervised financial market participants (EMI / PI counts).
https://www.lb.lt/en/fs-electronic-money-institutionsVerified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
CSSF — Public registers of EMIs / PIs / AISPs incorporated under Luxembourg law.
https://www.cssf.lu/en/Document/list-of-electronic-money-institutions-incorporated-under-luxembourg-law/Verified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
MFSA — Financial services register.
https://www.mfsa.mt/financial-services-register/Verified 2026-07-06 - Regulator-issued
CySEC: public registers and lists (EMI / PI counts carried forward from the July snapshot).
https://www.cysec.gov.cy/en-GB/entities/Verified 2026-07-06 - Primary statute
Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 (AMLR) — Single AML/CFT Rulebook, applicable 10 July 2027. AMLA operational 1 July 2025; first RTS tranche due 10 July 2026.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1624/ojVerified 2026-07-06 - Practitioner experience
Banking Access Temperature and tier posture are finconduit's own practitioner read, carried forward unchanged from the July 2026 review and not refreshed for this edition. Tier-archetype framing; no specific banks, EMIs, qualified custodians or individual CASPs are named.
Verified 2026-07-06
For orientation only — not financial, legal, regulatory, or investment advice. Outputs are directional and based on generalised inputs. Decisions should be taken only after consultation with a qualified adviser on your specific facts — book the full assessment before acting on anything you read here.
Numbers shown exclude finconduit fees and any third-party costs (legal, audit, regulator-mandated experts, banking-relationship fees, document-translation, ongoing supervisory levies, or local agent / service-provider charges). Real-world authorisation budgets typically exceed the headline regulator-side numbers by a meaningful multiple.